bb and bdm

my comments on mclaren's a generous orthodoxy are really not an attempt to make any sort of evaluation of the emergent church movement. as i mentioned in a previous post, i know very little about the movement. i feel fairly certain that anyone looking for that kind of evaluation can find persons much abler than myself to assist them in thinking through the pros and cons of the emergent church. today, i noticed one such evaluationdue to my lack of interest, i personally found the discussion of the new "loonatics" more exciting. but, as i remember, i also liked "new coke," which is quite possibly heretical i know. but i also prefer pepsi, so i suppose there is no going back. anyway, for those of you looking for something i neither can nor care to give, namely a more in-depth evaluation of the emergent movement, perhaps you should begin by looking here. if nothing else, it might make you want to catch some old looney tunes cartoons on cable. it stirred that desire in me.